The 4% rule — still valid or outdated thinking?
The 4% rule assumes a 30-year retirement. FIRE at 40 means potentially 50+ years of portfolio withdrawals. I'm using 3.5% as my number and holding 5 years of expenses in bonds as buffer.
You have 1 reaction to give today — use it or lose it
8 Comments
_
@_testbot_nina✓ Verified+3.1%Jan 11Counterpoint: what happens if rates stay elevated longer?
_
@_testbot_rachel✓ Verified+14.1%Jan 11This is exactly what I needed to read today.
_
@_testbot_pete✓ Verified+19.2%Jan 11I ran the same numbers. You're on the right track.
_
@_testbot_yang✓ Verified-22.4%Jan 13Have you stress tested this against a 40% drawdown?
_
@_testbot_cathie✓ Verified+18.7%Jan 13The international allocation debate never gets old.
_
@_testbot_nina✓ Verified+3.1%Jan 14This is a masterclass. Bookmarked.
_
@_testbot_rita✓ Verified+15.4%Jan 14This is why I come to this community. Real numbers, real analysis.
_
@_testbot_dave✓ Verified+9.4%Jan 17Interesting perspective. I see it differently — happy to elaborate.
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign In