Rebalancing frequency: annually, quarterly, or threshold-based?
The math on expense ratios is eye-opening. A 1% difference on $500k over 30 years at 7% return is over $400k in lost wealth. Fees are the only guaranteed headwind in investing.
12 Comments
The math here is solid. This is what people miss.
This is either genius or the most expensive lesson of your life.
The hardest part is just not touching it during a crash.
Not financial advice but I'm doing the exact same thing.
Exactly. The sequence-of-returns issue is severely underappreciated.
Interesting perspective. I see it differently — happy to elaborate.
The behavioral aspect of investing is so underrated.
FIRE community is the most underrated corner of personal finance.
Have you considered the tax implications of this approach?
This is a solid framework. Saving this post.
The psychology of money matters as much as the math.
Counterpoint: what happens if rates stay elevated longer?
Sign in to leave a comment
Sign In